Accessibility Statement

The Sonepar website is partially compliant with the general accessibility improvement guidelines.

The compliance audit to RGAA 4.1.2 conducted by numerik-ea reveals that:

• 50% of RGAA 4.1.2 criteria are met.

Details:

• Number of compliant criteria: 32
• Number of non-compliant criteria: 32
• Number of non-applicable criteria: 42

The content listed below is not accessible for the following reasons:

Non-compliance

List of non-compliant criteria:

• 1.2 Is each decorative image properly ignored by assistive technologies?
• 1.6 Does each image conveying information have, where necessary, a detailed description?
• 2.2 For each frame with a frame title, is this frame title relevant?
• 3.1 On each web page, information should not be conveyed only through color. Is this rule followed?
• 3.2 On each web page, is the contrast between a text color and its background color sufficient (except for particular cases?
• 3.3 On each web page, do colors used on interface components or graphical elements conveying information have sufficient contrast (except for particular cases)?
• 4.1 Does each pre-recorded time-based media have, where necessary, a text transcript or an audio description (except for particular cases)?
• 4.3 Does each pre-recorded time-based media have, where necessary, synchronized captions (except for particular cases)?
• 4.7 Is each time-based media clearly identifiable?
• 4.11 Can the consultation of each time-based media, where necessary, be controlled with a keyboard and any pointing device?
• 5.4 For each data table with a title, is the title properly associated to the data table?
• 5.8 Each presentation table should not use elements meant for data tables. Is this rule followed?
• 6.1 Each link is explicit (except for particular cases)?
• 7.1 Is each script, where necessary, compatible with assistive technologies? 
• 7.3 Can each script controlled with a keyboard or any pointing device (except for particular cases)?
• 7.5 On each web page, are status messages properly rendered by assistive technologies?
• 8.7 On each web page, is each change of language indicated in the source code (except for particular cases)?
• 8.9 On each web page, tags should not be used for presentation purposes. Is this rule followed?
• 9.3 On each web page, is each list structured appropriately?
• 9.4 On each web page, is each quotation identified properly?
• 10.1 On each web page, are style sheets used to control information presentation?
• 10.2 On each web page, does visible contents remain present when style sheets are disabled?
• 10.4 On each web page, is text still readable when character size is increased until at least 200% (except for particular cases)?
• 10.6 On each web page, can each link whose nature is not obvious be distinguished from the surrounding text?
• 10.9 On each web page, information must not be conveyed through shape, size or position alone. Is this rule followed?
• 10.11 For each web page, can the contents be presented without loss of information or functionality and without using either vertical scrolling for a window with a height of 256 px, or horizontal scrolling for a window with a width of 320 px (excluding special cases)?
• 10.13 On each web page, are additional contents appearing upon focus or hover over an interface component controllable by the user (except for particular cases)
• 11.1 Does each form field have a label?
• 11.10 In each form, is the input control used in a relevant way (except for particular cases)?
• 11.13 Can the purpose of an input field be deduced to facilitate the automatic input of the fields with the user’s data?
• 12.8 On each web page, is tabbing order consistent?
• 13.3 On each web page, does each electronic document that can be downloaded have an accessible version where necessary (except for particular cases)?

This statement was established on December 2, 2024.

Technologies used for the website development:

• HTML
• CSS
• Javascript

Test environment

The web pages were tested with the following combinations of web browsers and screen readers:

• NVDA, Firefox
• Jaws , Firefox
• Voiceover, Safari,

The following tools were used during the evaluation:

• WCAG contrast checker​
• HeadingsMap​
• Web developer​
• ARC Toolkit
• PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker)

Pages of the site that were subject to compliance verification:

1. Home https://www.sonepar.com/fr/ 
2. Contact https://www.sonepar.com/fr/contactez-nous 
3. Legal Notice https://www.sonepar.com/fr/mentions-legales 
4. Supply Chain https://www.sonepar.com/fr/offre/chaine-d-approvisionnement 
5. Suppliers - https://www.sonepar.com/fr/offre/fournisseurs 
6. Offer - Projects https://www.sonepar.com/fr/offre/projets 
7. Acquisitions - https://www.sonepar.com/fr/a-propos/acquisitions 
8. Compliance and Integrity https://www.sonepar.com/fr/engagements/conformite-et-integrite 
9. Diversity and Inclusion https://www.sonepar.com/fr/engagements/diversite-et-inclusion 
10. News List https://www.sonepar.com/fr/actualites 
11. News https://www.sonepar.com/fr/actualites/sonepar-renforce-son-expertise-en-g%C3%A9nie-climatique-avec-l-acquisition-de-hydeclim--75744

If you are unable to access content or a service, you can contact the website manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another form:

• Website Manager

This procedure should be used in the following case:

1. You have reported an accessibility issue to the website manager that prevents you from accessing content or services, and you have not received a satisfactory response.

2. Write a message to the Defender of Rights (https://formulaire.defenseurdesdroits.fr/).

3. Contact the regional delegate of the Defender of Rights (https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/saisir/delegues).

4. Send a letter by mail (free, no stamp needed)

• Defender of Rights
• Libre réponse 71120
• 75342 Paris CEDEX 07